Peer Review Process
Jurnal Ilmu Fisika (JIF) ensures that all manuscripts are subjected to a fair, unbiased, and transparent double-blind peer review process, as endorsed by COPE's Core Practices.
Peer Review Model:
JIF employs a double-blind peer review model where both the reviewers and the authors are anonymized to maintain impartiality and confidentiality throughout the review process.
At least two reviewers with expertise in the subject matter of the manuscript are carefully selected for each submission to provide objective and constructive feedback.
JIF is committed to the continuous training of its editors and reviewers, ensuring they are well-versed in the ethical aspects and best practices of peer review.
Management of Peer Review:
The review process is meticulously managed to ensure timely, rigorous, and fair assessment of submitted manuscripts.
Conflicts of Interest:
Clear policies are in place to manage potential conflicts of interest for reviewers, authors, and editors, ensuring that any conflicts are disclosed and addressed appropriately.
Appeals and Disputes:
JIF provides a clear and structured process for handling appeals and disputes that may arise during the peer review process, ensuring a resolution that is in line with COPE guidelines.
This policy upholds the integrity of JIF’s peer review process and reinforces our commitment to excellence in scholarly publishing.