Wind Gust Parameterization Assessment under Convective and Non-convective Events: A Case Study at the Kertajati International Airport

Authors

  • Muhammad Rafid Zulfikar Undergraduate Program in Meteorology, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology. Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rais Abdillah Atmospheric Sciences Research Group, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
  • Prasanti Widyasih Sarli Structural Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.15.2.175-187.2023

Keywords:

Kertajati, gust, parameterization, wind, WRF

Abstract

Wind gusts (gusts) are sudden increases in wind speed that potentially cause severe damage to infrastructure. Gusts occur within several seconds but numerical weather models typically predict future wind with a time step of tens of seconds or minutes. Therefore, a parameterization is needed to estimate gust. Gusts can be produced convectively and non-convectively depending on the presense of thunderstorm. The gust parameterization schemes may perform differently in both cases. In this study, five wind gust parameterization schemes were evaluated at the Kertajati International Airport. Based on simulations of three convective gust and three non-convective gust events using several evaluation metrics, we find that the best scheme for non-convectively driven gusts is the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) scheme, while the Hybrid scheme performs best for convectively driven gusts. However, the performance of Hybrid scheme during non-convective event is not so far behind TKE scheme. The Hybrid scheme was developed to work on both non-convective and convective events and this capability is evidently shown. The result could be useful to develop mitigation measures for strong wind incident that frequently occurs in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. R., Sarli, P. W., Firmansyah, H. R., Sakti, A. D., Fajary, F. R., Muharsyah, R., & Sudarman, G. G. (2022). Extreme Wind Variability and Wind Map Development in Western Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 13(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00420-7

Amirudin, A. A., E. Salimun, M. Zuhairi, F. Tangang, L. Juneng, M. S. F. Mohd, and J. X. Chung, 2022: The Importance of Cumulus Parameterization and Resolution in Simulating Rainfall over Peninsular Malaysia. Atmosphere, 13, 1557, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101557.

Bechtold, P., & Bidlot, J.-R. (2009). Parametrization of convective gusts. https://doi.org/10.21957/KFR42KFP8C

Bessho, K., Date, K., Hayashi, M., Ikeda, A., Imai, T., Inoue, H., Kumagai, Y., Miyakawa, T., Murata, H., Ohno, T., Okuyama, A., Oyama, R., Sasaki, Y., Shimazu, Y., Shimoji, K., Sumida, Y., Suzuki, M., Taniguchi, H., Tsuchiyama, H., … Yoshida, R. (2016). An Introduction to Himawari-8/9—Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 94(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-009

BNPB (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana). 2022. Data and Information of Disasters in Indonesia (Data Informasi Bencana Indonesia-DIBI). Jakarta Timur, Indonesia: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.

Born, K., Ludwig, P., & Pinto, J. G. (2012). Wind gust estimation for Mid-European winter storms: Towards a probabilistic view. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 64(1), 17471. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.17471

Brasseur, O. (2001). Development and Application of a Physical Approach to Estimating Wind Gusts. Monthly Weather Review, 129(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0005:DAAOAP>2.0.CO;2

Fovell, R. G., & Cao, Y. (n.d.). 5A.2 Wind and Gust Forecasting in Complex Terrain. 10.

Goyette, S., Brasseur, O., & Beniston, M. (2003). Application of a new wind gust parameterization: Multiscale case studies performed with the Canadian regional climate model: APPLICATION OF A WIND GUST PARAMETERIZATION. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D13), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002646

Gutiérrez, A., & Fovell, R. G. (2018). A new gust parameterization for weather prediction models. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 177, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.04.005

Knigge, C., & Raasch, S. (2016). Improvement and development of one- and two-dimensional discrete gust models using a large-eddy simulation model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 153, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.03.004

Kurbatova, M., Rubinstein, K., Gubenko, I., & Kurbatov, G. (2018). Comparison of seven wind gust parameterizations over the European part of Russia. Advances in Science and Research, 15, 251–255. https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-251-2018

Leelőssy, Á., Molnár, F., Izsák, F., Havasi, Á., Lagzi, I., & Mészáros, R. (2014). Dispersion modeling of air pollutants in the atmosphere: A review. Open Geosciences, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-012-0188-6

NCEP-National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce. 2015, updated daily. NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids. Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z. Accessed 1 January 2022

Nugraha, A. A. A., & Trilaksono, N. J. (2018). Simulation of wind gust – Producing thunderstorm outflow over Mahakam block using WRF. 020051. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5047336

Rose (NOAA), M. A. (n.d.). Downbursts. NOAA’s National Weather Service. Retrieved 15 July 2022, from https://www.weather.gov/ohx/downbursts

Sarli, P. W., M. R. Abdillah, and A. D. Sakti (2020): Relationship between wind incidents and wind-induced damage to construction in West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 592, 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012001.

Schnelle, K. B. (2003). Atmospheric Diffusion Modeling. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Third Edition) (pp. 679–705). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00036-3

Seman, S. (n.d.). Single-Cell Thunderstorms | METEO 3: Introductory Meteorology. Retrieved 15 July 2022, from https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo3/l8_p5.html

Sheridan, P. (2014). Forecasting Research Technical Report 570. 22.

Skamarock, William C, Joseph B Klemp, Jimy Dudhia, David O Gill, Dale M Barker, Michael G Duda, Xiang-Yu Huang, Wei Wang, and Jordan G Powers (2019). A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. Colorado: NCAR.

Wyngaard, J. C. (2004). Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita”. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 61(14), 1816–1826. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1816:TNMITT>2.0.CO;2

Yulihastin, E., D. E. Nuryanto, Trismidianto, and R. Muharsyah, 2021: Improvement of Heavy Rainfall Simulated with SST Adjustment Associated with Mesoscale Convective Complexes Related to Severe Flash Flood in Luwu, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Atmosphere, 12, 1445, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111445.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-09

How to Cite

Zulfikar, M. R., Abdillah, M. R., & Sarli, P. W. (2023). Wind Gust Parameterization Assessment under Convective and Non-convective Events: A Case Study at the Kertajati International Airport . JURNAL ILMU FISIKA, 15(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.15.2.175-187.2023

Issue

Section

Research Article

Citation Check