Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)

In recognition of the evolving role of artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing, Jurnal Ilmu Fisika (JIF) has established a policy governing the responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). This policy aligns with the principles of research integrity, transparency, accountability, and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s Core Practices.

Scope and Definition

Generative AI refers to artificial intelligence technologies capable of generating or modifying text, images, code, data representations, and other content. These technologies may support scientific research and manuscript preparation but must not replace human intellectual contributions, critical analysis, or scientific judgment.

This policy applies to authors, editors, and reviewers involved in JIF's publication process.

Transparency in AI Use

Authors who use generative AI tools in preparing their manuscripts must disclose their use in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage Declaration section.

The declaration should identify the AI tool and its provider, describe the specific purposes for which it was used, and clarify the extent of its involvement in manuscript preparation or research activities.

Routine spelling, grammar, and formatting assistance that does not generate or substantially modify scientific content does not require a detailed declaration.

Authors who have not used generative AI should explicitly state this in the declaration section.

Authorship and Contribution

Generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors because they cannot assume responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of scholarly work.

Human authors retain full responsibility for all manuscript content, including text, analyses, figures, references, and conclusions generated or assisted by AI.

The use of AI does not replace the requirement for original intellectual contributions from the authors.

Quality, Accuracy, and Accountability

Authors must critically evaluate and verify all AI-assisted content before including it in their manuscripts.

Particular attention must be given to the accuracy of scientific statements, references, numerical calculations, statistical analyses, and interpretations.

Fabricated references, unsupported scientific claims, misleading interpretations, or inaccurate information generated by AI are unacceptable.

The use of generative AI does not reduce the responsibility of authors to ensure the reliability, reproducibility, and scientific integrity of their research.

Research Data, Images, and Scientific Results

Generative AI must not be used to fabricate, falsify, or deceptively manipulate research data, experimental observations, scientific images, or results.

AI-based methods used as legitimate research tools, including machine learning, image processing, simulation, and computational analysis, are permitted when scientifically justified and adequately described in the methodology.

Authors must provide sufficient methodological information to support the evaluation and reproducibility of AI-based research.

Intellectual Property and Confidentiality

Authors must ensure that the use of generative AI does not infringe intellectual property rights, violate confidentiality obligations, or expose sensitive or unpublished research information without appropriate authorization.

Relevant datasets, software, algorithms, and AI models used as part of the research methodology must be appropriately acknowledged and referenced.

Use of AI by Editors and Reviewers

Editors and reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts, unpublished research data, and editorial communications throughout the peer review and editorial processes.

Reviewers are prohibited from using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to review, evaluate, summarize, analyze, or generate review reports for submitted manuscripts. Reviewers must not upload manuscripts, unpublished data, figures, or confidential editorial correspondence to generative AI platforms or services.

Editors may use AI tools for limited administrative or editorial support, provided that such use does not compromise confidentiality, data protection, editorial independence, or research integrity. Confidential manuscript content and editorial information must not be disclosed to external AI services.

AI tools must not replace independent scientific judgment or human responsibility in the editorial decision-making process. All manuscript evaluations, reviewer recommendations, and editorial decisions must be made by qualified human experts.

Editors and reviewers remain fully responsible for maintaining the accuracy, fairness, objectivity, confidentiality, and integrity of the peer review and editorial processes, in accordance with JIF's Publication Ethics and Peer Review policies.

Ethical Considerations and Editorial Actions

The use of generative AI must comply with JIF's existing Publication Ethics, Intellectual Property, and Allegations of Misconduct policies.

Undisclosed or inappropriate use of AI that compromises research integrity may result in requests for clarification, manuscript revision, rejection, or post-publication corrective action, depending on the nature and severity of the issue.

Editorial decisions will be based on the available evidence and the journal's established ethical procedures.

Ongoing Evaluation

JIF will periodically review and update this policy to reflect developments in AI technologies, scientific publishing practices, and relevant guidance from recognized publication ethics organizations.

JIF supports the responsible use of AI as a research and writing aid while maintaining the fundamental principles of transparency, originality, accountability, confidentiality, and scientific integrity.