Radiobiological Evaluation of Stage III Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy Using EUD-Based TCP and NTCP in 3DCRT

Authors

  • Angelica Defalma Department of Physics, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sri Oktamuliani Medical Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang, 25163, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ilyas Medical Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang, 25163, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.18.2.199-209.2026

Keywords:

Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy, Homogeneity Index , Conformity Index, Equivalent Uniform Dose

Abstract

This study evaluated the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in 24 patients with Stage III cervical cancer treated with Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) at Universitas Andalas Hospital, using an Indonesian clinical dataset for context-specific radiobiological evaluation. Physical dose quality was assessed using the Homogeneity Index (HI) and Conformity Index (CI). Biological effectiveness was evaluated using Niemierko’s Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) model to determine Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP). Dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were extracted from the Eclipse TPS and processed via Python. Physical planning demonstrated acceptable conformity (CI = 0.9695 ± 0.0084) and homogeneity (HI = 0.0739 ± 0.0129). Mean TCP for the external beam radiotherapy phase (50 Gy in 25 fractions) was 41.36% ± 0.31%, representing moderate biological control prior to brachytherapy. Organs at risk exhibited low toxicity for the rectum (NTCP = 0.40% ± 0.18%) and bowel (NTCP = 2.06% ± 3.00%). Conversely, the bladder showed the highest complication risk (NTCP = 83.16% ± 26.78%, EUD = 93.57 ± 9.99 Gy), frequently exceeding tolerance limits due to anatomical proximity and volume variability. 3DCRT yields satisfactory physical coverage and rectal/bowel sparing, but requires standardized bladder protocols to minimize toxicity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antony, F., Mathew Varghese, K., Jomon Raphael, C., Paul Gopu, G., & Sivakumar, S. (2021). Dosimetric comparison of organs at risk with three-dimensional conformal radiation, intensity-modulated radiation and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in cervical cancer: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Advances in Medicine, 8(4), 586–590. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20210978

Cherry, P., & Duxbury, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Practical Radiotherapy: Physics and Equipment (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8426-7.

Effina, A., Milvita, D., & Ilyas, M. (2022). Distribusi dosis radiasi foton pada treatment planning system menggunakan teknik 3DCRT dan IMRT untuk terapi kanker serviks. Jurnal Fisika Unand, 11(1), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.25077/jfu.11.1.126-130.2022

Fader, A. N. (2018). Surgery in cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(20), 1955–1957. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1814034

Fatimah, N., & Widita, R. (2018). Penentuan Tumor Control Probability (TCP) dengan memperhitungkan efek repair menggunakan model Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD). Prosiding SKF 2018, 108–113.

Gonultas, L. (2026). Determining optimal conformity index values in pelvic region radiotherapy planning under ICRU 50/62, ICRU 83, and RTOG/NRG guidelines. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 27(5), e70635. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70635

Khatun, S. (2018). Prevention of cervical cancer. Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 33(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v33i1.43266

Gulliford, S. L., Partridge, M., Sydes, M. R., Webb, S., Evans, P. M., & Dearnaley, D. P. (2012). Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 102(3), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.022

Li, S., Gong, Y., Yang, Y., Guo, Q., Qian, J., & Tian, Y. (2020). Evaluation of small bowel motion and feasibility of using the peritoneal space to replace bowel loops for dose constraints during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Radiation Oncology, 15(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01650-z

Malafi, M. E. (2024). The lives saved: A literature review on the role of radiotherapy improving prognosis in cancer patients. Journal of Quality in Health Care & Economics, 7(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.23880/jqhe-16000360

Mayadev, J. S., Ke, G., Mahantshetty, U., Pereira, M. D., Tarnawski, R., & Toita, T. (2022). Global challenges of radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 32(3), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-003001

Mazonakis, M., Tzanis, E., Lyraraki, E., & Damilakis, J. (2022). Automatic radiobiological comparison of radiation therapy plans: An application to gastric cancer. Cancers, 14(24), 6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246098

Mazonakis, M., Kachris, S., Tolia, M., & Damilakis, J. (2023). NTCP calculations of five different irradiation techniques for the treatment of thymoma. Current Oncology, 30(8), 7740–7752. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080561

Nadova, K., Burghardtova, M., Fejfarova, K., Reginacova, K., & Malikova, H. (2021). Late radiation-related toxicities in patients treated for early-stage cervical carcinoma by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy: A retrospective imaging study. Pathology and Oncology Research, 27, 1609915. https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1609915

Nuraini, R., & Widita, R. (2019). Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) with consideration of cell biological effect. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1245(1), 012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1245/1/012092

Okunieff, P., Morgan, D., Niemierko, A., & Suit, H. D. (1995). Radiation dose-response of human tumors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 32(4), 1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00475-Z

Pandey, U., & Bansal, P. (2017). What is cervical cancer? Journal of Gynecology and Women’s Health, 2(5), 555599. https://doi.org/10.19080/JGWH.2017.02.555599

Pratista, T. A., & Widita, R. (2023). Determination of fractionation scheme based on repair effect using Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) model. Indonesian Journal of Physics, 34(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.5614/itb.ijp.2023.34.2.2

Rather, S. A., Banday, M. S., & Qureshi, M. Z. (2024). Dosimetric analysis and radiobiological impact of radiotherapy planning techniques for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in terms of Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability. Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research, 16(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_2_24

Zhang, F., Zhou, M., Wang, G., Li, X., Yue, L., Deng, L., Chi, K., Chen, K., Qi, Z., Deng, X., Peng, Y., & Liu, Y. (2023). Evaluation of bladder filling effects on the dose distribution during radiotherapy for cervical cancer based on daily CT images. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 24(11), e14097. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14097

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Defalma, A., Sri Oktamuliani, & Muhammad Ilyas. (2026). Radiobiological Evaluation of Stage III Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy Using EUD-Based TCP and NTCP in 3DCRT. JURNAL ILMU FISIKA | UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS, 18(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.18.2.199-209.2026

Issue

Section

Research Article

Citation Check