A Computational Physics–Based Machine Learning Modelling of Multiphase Flow Dynamics for Crude Oil Percentage Prediction Using Water Cut and Sediment Indicators

Authors

  • Jesi Pebralia Physics Study Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Jambi, Muaro Jambi, 36361, Indonesia
  • Iful Amri Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Ogan Ilir, 30128 , Indonesia
  • Dwi Rahmah Amanda Physics Study Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Jambi, Muaro Jambi, 36361, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Aziz Kurniawan PT. Pertamina EP Field 1 Jambi, Jambi, 36129, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.18.1.80-92.2026

Keywords:

Basic sediment and water, Crude oil, Linear model, Machine learning, Prediction

Abstract

Existing crude oil percentage prediction methods often rely on direct measurements and historical data, neglecting the coupled multiphase characteristics of oil–water–sediment systems, which limits predictive accuracy. This study develops a computational physics–based machine learning model integrating key multiphase production parameters, including water cut, basic sediment, and BS&W, using samples from PT. Pertamina Puspa Field Jambi. Data were split into two sets: one for model development and one for validation to prevent overfitting. Linear Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest algorithms were applied, with Linear Regression achieving the best performance. For the test dataset, the model yielded a Mean Absolute Error of 0.022168, a Mean Squared Error of 0.001227, and an accuracy of 0.99877, demonstrating precise capture of multiphase interactions. The proposed computational physics–based modelling framework provided improved predictive reliability and consistency. Correlation analyses indicated a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.99 and a perfect negative correlation (r = −1) between BS&W and oil content, showing that higher BS&W corresponds to lower oil percentage. This framework offers improved predictive reliability and consistency for crude oil quality assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdalla, R., Al-Hakimi, W., Perozo, N., & Jaeger, P. (2023). Real-Time Liquid Rate and Water Cut Prediction From the Electrical Submersible Pump Sensors Data Using Machine-Learning Algorithms. ACS Omega, 8(14), 12671–12692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07609

Al-Mudhafar, W. J. (2020). Integrating machine learning and data analytics for geostatistical characterization of clastic reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195(April), 107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107837

Alfian, G., Saputra, Y. M., Subekti, L., Rahmawati, A. D., Atmaji, F. T. D., & Rhee, J. (2023). Utilizing deep neural network for web-based blood glucose level prediction system. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 30(3), 1829–1837. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v30.i3.pp1829-1837

Aman, & Chhillar, R. S. (2023). Optimized stacking ensemble for early-stage diabetes mellitus prediction. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(6), 7048–7055. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i6.pp7048-7055

Asadullah, M., Hossain, M. M., Rahaman, S., Amin, M. S., Sumy, M. S. A., Parh, M. Y. A., & Hossain, M. A. (2023). Evaluation of machine learning techniques for hypertension risk prediction based on medical data in Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 31(3), 1794–1802. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v31.i3.pp1794-1802

Athambawa, A., Johar, M. G. M., & Khatibi, A. (2023). Behavioural intention to adopt cloud computing: A quantitative analysis with a mediatory factor using bootstrapping. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(1), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i1.pp458-467

Baruah, B., & Tiwari, P. (2020). Effect of high pressure on nonisothermal pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale and product yield. Energy and Fuels, 34(12), 15855–15869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02538

Carleo, G., Cirac, I., Cranmer, K., Daudet, L., Schuld, M., Tishby, N., Vogt-Maranto, L., & Zdeborová, L. (2019). Machine learning and the physical sciences. Reviews of Modern Physics, 91(4), 45002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002

Chen, H., Zhang, C., Jia, N., Duncan, I., Yang, S., & Yang, Y. Z. (2021). A machine learning model for predicting the minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 and crude oil system based on a support vector machine algorithm approach. Fuel, 290, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120048

Fan, D., Lai, S., Sun, H., Yang, Y., Yang, C., Fan, N., & Wang, M. (2025). Review of Machine Learning Methods for Steady State Capacity and Transient Production Forecasting in Oil and Gas Reservoir. Energies, 18(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040842

Fayomi, O. S. I., Akande, I. G., & Odigie, S. (2019). Economic Impact of Corrosion in Oil Sectors and Prevention: An Overview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022037

Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras & TensorFlow (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Hanafy, H. H., Macary, S. M., ElNady, Y. M., Bayomi, A. A., & El Batanony, M. H. (1997). A New Approach for Predicting the Cruide Oil Properties. SPE Production Operations Symposium, 439–452. https://www.onepetro.org/doi/10.2118/37439-MS

Harlim, J., Jiang, S. W., Liang, S., & Yang, H. (2021). Machine learning for prediction with missing dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 428, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109922

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2008). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (2nd ed.). Springer Inc. https://www.springerlink.com/index/D7X7KX6772HQ2135.pdf

Huffman, A. R. (2004). The future of pressure prediction using geophysical methods. AAPG Memoir, 76, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1306/m76870c19

Kamal, B., Abbasi, Z., & Hassanzadeh, H. (2023). Water-Cut Measurement Techniques in Oil Production and Processing—A Review. Energies, 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176410

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Le, M. T., Vo, M. T., Pham, N. T., & Dao, S. V. T. (2021). Predicting heart failure using a wrapper-based feature selection. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 21(3), 1530–1539. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i3.pp1530-1539

Litvinenko, V. S. (2020). Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Natural Resources Research, 29(3), 1521–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4

Mair, C., Kadoda, G., Lefley, M., Phalp, K., Schofield, C., Shepperd, M., & Webster, S. (2000). An Investigation of machine learning based prediction systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 53(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00005-4

Masrom, S., Rahman, R. A., Baharun, N., Rohani, S. R. S., & Rahman, A. S. A. (2023). Machine learning with task-technology fit theory factors for predicting students’ adoption in video-based learning. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(3), 1666–1673. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i3.5037

Muneer, A., Ali, R. F., Alghamdi, A., Taib, S. M., Almaghthawi, A., & Abdullah Ghaleb, E. A. (2022). Predicting customers churning in banking industry: A machine learning approach. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 26(1), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i1.pp539-549

Ngene, S., Tota-Maharaj, K., Eke, P., & Hills, C. (2016). To cite this article: Stanley Ngene, Kiran Tota-Maharaj, Paul Eke, Colin Hills. Environmental and Economic Impacts of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Developing Countries. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 1(3), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20160103.13

Obite, C. P., Chukwu, A., Bartholomew, D. C., Nwosu, U. I., & Esiaba, G. E. (2021). Classical and machine learning modeling of crude oil production in Nigeria: Identification of an eminent model for application. Energy Reports, 7, 3497–3505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.005

Okan, M., Aydin, H. M., & Barsbay, M. (2019). Current approaches to waste polymer utilization and minimization: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 94(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5778

Onuoha, M. E., & Elegbede, I. O. (2018). The Oil Boom Era: Socio-Political and Economic Consequences. In The Political Ecology of Oil and Gas Activities in the Nigerian Aquatic Ecosystem. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809399-3.00006-9

Pebralia, J., Amri, I., & Rifa’i, A. I. (2022). Measuring convective heat transfer in a room equipped with an air conditioner. Physics Education, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac832e

Qaim, M., Sibhatu, K. T., Siregar, H., & Grass, I. (2020). Environmental, economic, and social consequences of the oil palm boom. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-024922

Raljević, D., Parlov Vuković, J., Smrečki, V., Marinić Pajc, L., Novak, P., Hrenar, T., Jednačak, T., Konjević, L., Pinević, B., & Gašparac, T. (2021). Machine learning approach for predicting crude oil stability based on NMR spectroscopy. Fuel, 305(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121561

Ramírez-Pradilla, J. S., Blanco-Tirado, C., Hubert-Roux, M., Giusti, P., Afonso, C., & Combariza, M. Y. (2019). Comprehensive Petroporphyrin Identification in Crude Oils Using Highly Selective Electron Transfer Reactions in MALDI-FTICR-MS. Energy and Fuels, 33(5), 3899–3907. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04325

Ruble, I. (2019). The U.S. crude oil refining industry: Recent developments, upcoming challenges and prospects for exports. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20(August 2019), e00132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00132

Saad, M. A., Kamil, M., Abdurahman, N. H., Yunus, R. M., & Awad, O. I. (2019). An overview of recent advances in state-of-the-art techniques in the demulsification of crude oil emulsions. Processes, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070470

Seko, A., Hayashi, H., Nakayama, K., Takahashi, A., & Tanaka, I. (2017). Representation of compounds for machine-learning prediction of physical properties. Physical Review B, 95(14), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.144110

Sun, L., Fang, C., Li, F., Zhu, R., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Jia, A., Gao, X., & Su, L. (2015). Innovations and challenges of sedimentology in oil and gas exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 42(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(15)30001-X

Wlazlowski, S. (2007). Crude oil — end‐product linkages in the European petroleum markets. OPEC Review, 31(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0076.2007.00177.x

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Pebralia, J., Amri, I., Amanda, D. R., & Kurniawan, M. A. (2026). A Computational Physics–Based Machine Learning Modelling of Multiphase Flow Dynamics for Crude Oil Percentage Prediction Using Water Cut and Sediment Indicators. JURNAL ILMU FISIKA | UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS, 18(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.18.1.80-92.2026

Issue

Section

Research Article

Citation Check