Developing Surface Rainfall Data Based on Blending of Satellite-Based Products and Rain Gauge Observations in the Ngawi Region, East Java

Authors

  • Joko Budi Utomo Agency for Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics (BMKG), 10610, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eko Yuli Handoko Department of Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9654-2530
  • Muhammad Aldila Syariz Department of Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111, Surabaya, , Indonesia
  • Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan Agency for Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics (BMKG), 10610, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.17.2.110-124.2025

Keywords:

Surface Rainfall, Satellite product, Kriging, Rain gauge, Leave-one-out cross validation

Abstract

Rainfall estimation can be performed using various methods, including direct satellite observations (RR-Satellite). However, these estimates show discrepancies when compared to actual observations in-situ rain gauges (RR-Obs). To address this challenge, one potential solution is integrating RR-Satellite with RR-Obs. The Kriging with External Drift (KED) interpolation method is a blending technique that incorporates RR-Satellite as external drift. This study utilized four satellite dataset, namely CHIRP, CMORPH, GSMAP_V8, and IMERG as auxiliary information to generate monthly rainfall estimates (RR-Blended) at 26 rain gauges in Ngawi, East Java, for the period 2001 - 2023. The performance of each satellite dataset was evaluated using Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV). The results indicated that RR-Blended using CHIRP (bCHIRP) demonstrated the best accuracy at the climatological scale, with KGE > 0.3 and TSS > 0.65, outperforming other satellite dataset. At the monthly scale, bCHIRP, bCMORPH, and bIMERG showed better performance in different months throughout the year. In terms of spatial accuracy, bCMORPH achieved the highest performance. Our findings suggest that each satellite offers unique advantages based on the time and location of observation. Therefore, we recommend using a weighted combination of RR-Blended from four satellites as the most effective approach for obtaining the best rainfall estimates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrian, E., & Dwi Susanto, R. (2003). Identification of three dominant rainfall regions within Indonesia and their relationship to sea surface temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 23(12), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.950

Bai, L., Shi, C., Li, L., Yang, Y., & Wu, J. (2018). Accuracy of CHIRPS satellite-rainfall products over mainland China. Remote Sensing, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030362

Beck, H. E., Vergopolan, N., Pan, M., Levizzani, V., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Weedon, G. P., Brocca, L., Pappenberger, F., Huffman, G. J., & Wood, E. F. (2017). Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(12), 6201–6217. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017

BMKG. (2021). Buku Peta Rata-rata Curah Hujan dan Hari Hujan Periode 1991-2020 Indonesia. BMKG. https://iklim.bmkg.go.id/bmkgadmin/storage/buletin/20220511_BukuNormal_Lengkap_FormatBuku.pdf

Cantet, P. (2017). Mapping the mean monthly precipitation of a small island using kriging with external drifts. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 127(1–2), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1610-z

Chappell, A., Renzullo, L. H., Raupach, T. J., & Haylock, M. (2013). Evaluating geostatistical methods of blending satellite and gauge data to estimate near real-time daily rainfall for Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 493, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.024

Chua, Z. W., Kuleshov, Y., Watkins, A. B., Choy, S., & Sun, C. (2022). A Two‐Step Approach to Blending GSMaP Satellite Rainfall Estimates with Gauge Observations over Australia. Remote Sensing, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081903

Fatkhuroyan, & TrinahWati. (2018). Accuracy Assessment of Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) Product over Indonesian Maritime Continent. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 187(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/187/1/012060

Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., & Michaelsen, J. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations - A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66

Goshime, D. W., Absi, R., & Ledésert, B. (2019). Evaluation and bias correction of CHIRP rainfall estimate for rainfall-runoff simulation over Lake Ziway Watershed, Ethiopia. Hydrology, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology6030068

Groisman, P. ya, & Legates, D. R. (1994). The Accuracy SS of United States Precipitation Data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 75(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<0215:TAOUSP>2.0.CO;2

Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Stein, A. (2003). Comparison of kriging with external drift and regression-kriging *. In ITC, Technical Note. ITC, Technical Note. https://www.itc.nl/library/Academic

Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D., Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., & Iguchi, T. (2014). The global precipitation measurement mission. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(5), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1

Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., & Tan, J. (2019). Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Technical Documentation. In IMERG Tech Document.

Jewell, S. A., & Gaussiat, N. (2015). An assessment of kriging-based rain-gauge-radar merging techniques. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141(691), 2300–2313. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2522

Jiang, Q., Li, W., Wen, J., Fan, Z., Chen, Y., Scaioni, M., & Wang, J. (2019). Evaluation of satellite-based products for extreme rainfall estimations in the eastern coastal areas of China. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 16(1), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2019.1707233

Joyce, R. J., Janowiak, J. E., Arkin, P. A., & Xie, P. (2004). CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution. Journal of Hydrology, 5(3), 487–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2

Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., & Woods, R. A. (2019). Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash-Sutcliffe and Kling-Gupta efficiency scores. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-327

Kubota, T., Shige, S., Hashizume, H., Aonashi, K., Takahashi, N., Seto, S., Hirose, M., Takayabu, Y. N., Ushio, T., Nakagawa, K., Iwanami, K., Kachi, M., & Okamoto, K. (2007). Global precipitation map using satellite-borne microwave radiometers by the GSMaP project: Production and validation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(7), 2259–2275. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895337

Lin, A., & Wang, X. L. (2011). An algorithm for blending multiple satellite precipitation estimates with in situ precipitation measurements in Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 116(21). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016359

Ly, S., Charles, C., & Degré, A. (2011). Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: The use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(7), 2259–2274. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011

Mathevet, T., Le Moine, N., Andréassian, V., Gupta, H., & Oudin, L. (2023). Multi-objective assessment of hydrological model performances using Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiencies on a worldwide large sample of watersheds. Comptes Rendus - Geoscience, 355. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.189

Michaelides, S., Levizzani, V., Anagnostou, E., Bauer, P., Kasparis, T., & Lane, J. E. (2009). Precipitation: Measurement, remote sensing, climatology and modeling. Atmospheric Research, 94(4), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.08.017

Michelson, D. B. (2004). Systematic correction of precipitation gauge observations using analyzed meteorological variables. Journal of Hydrology, 290(3–4), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.005

Muharsyah, R., Fitria Kussatiti, D., Ripaldi, A., Maharani, T., Nur Ratri, D., Hanif Damayanti, R., Denata, M., Yuswantoro, A., & Wahyuni, N. (2021). Mengukur Penambahan Curah Hujan pada 34 Provinsi di Indonesia saat Periode La Nina Menggunakan Blending Curah Hujan Pengamatan In-Situ Dan Satelite (Measuring Rainfall Increament Over 34 Provinces in Indonesia During La Nina Period using Blending Rainfall In-Situ and Satellite Observation). Seminar Nasional Geomatika BIG.

Mulsandi, A., Koesmaryono, Y., Hidayat, R., Faqih, A., & Sopaheluwakan, A. (2024). Detecting Indonesian Monsoon Signals and Related Features Using Space–Time Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). Atmosphere, 15(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15020187

Murphy, B., Yurchak, R., & Müller, S. (2024). GeoStat-Framework/PyKrige: v1.7.2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11360184

Nanding, N., Rico-Ramirez, M. A., & Han, D. (2015). Comparison of different radar-raingauge rainfall merging techniques. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 17(3), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2015.001

Novia Nur Rohma. (2022). Estimation of Ordinary Kriging Method with Jackknife Technique on Rainfall Data in Malang Raya. International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (IJoICT), 8(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.21108/ijoict.v8i2.678

Oliver, M. A., & Webster, R. (2015). Springer Briefs in Agriculture Basic Steps in Geostatistics: The Variogram and Kriging. Springer. https://doi.org/DOI10.1007/978-3-319-15865-5

Pang, Y., Wang, Y., Lai, X., Zhang, S., Liang, P., & Song, X. (2023). Enhanced Kriging leave-one-out cross-validation in improving model estimation and optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116194

Peterson, T. C., Easterling, D. R., Karl, T. R., Groisman, P., Nicholls, N., Plummer, N., Torok, S., Auer, I., Boehm, R., Gullett, D., Vincent, L., Heino, R., Tuomenvirta, H., Mestre, O., Tama´, T., Szentimrey, T., Salinger, J., Førland, E. J., Hanssen-Bauer, I., … Parker, D. (1998). A review. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 18(13), 1493-1517.

Pratama, A., Agiel, H. M., & Oktaviana, A. A. (2022). Evaluasi Satellite Precipitation Product (GSMaP, CHIRPS, dan IMERG) di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Journal of Science and Applicative Technology, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.35472/jsat.v6i1.702

Pririzki, S. J., Sari, N., Agustin, B., Razaf, Y., & Simbolon, E. (2022). Penerapan Model Semivariogram Eksperimental Pada Curah Hujan Bulanan Di Indonesia (Application of Experimental Semivariogram Model on Monthly Rainfall In Indonesia). Jurnal Fraction, 2(1), 1–7.

Ramadhan, R., Marzuki, M., Yusnaini, H., Muharsyah, R., Tangang, F., Vonnisa, M., & Harmadi, H. (2023). A Preliminary Assessment of the GSMaP Version 08 Products over Indonesian Maritime Continent against Gauge Data. Remote Sensing, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041115

Ramadhan, R., Marzuki, M., Yusnaini, H., Muharsyah, R., Suryanto, W., Sholihun, S., Vonnisa, M., Battaglia, A., & Hashiguchi, H. (2022). Capability of GPM IMERG Products for Extreme Precipitation Analysis over the Indonesian Maritime Continent. Remote Sensing, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020412

Shen, G., Chen, N., Wang, W., & Chen, Z. (2019). WHU-SGCC: A novel approach for blending daily satellite (CHIRP) and precipitation observations over the Jinsha River basin. Earth System Science Data, 11(4), 1711–1744. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1711-2019

Sideris, I. V., Gabella, M., Erdin, R., & Germann, U. (2014). Real-time radar-rain-gauge merging using spatio-temporal co-kriging with external drift in the alpine terrain of Switzerland. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140(680), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2188

Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 106(D7), 7183–7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719

van den Besselaar, E. J. M., van der Schrier, G., Cornes, R. C., Suwondo, A., Iqbal, & Tank, A. M. G. K. (2017). SA-OBS: A daily gridded surface temperature and precipitation dataset for Southeast Asia. Journal of Climate, 30(14), 5151–5165. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0575.1

Verdin, A., Rajagopalan, B., Kleiber, W., & Funk, C. (2015). A Bayesian kriging approach for blending satellite and ground precipitation observations. Water Resources Research, 51(2), 908–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015963

Vernimmen, R. R. E., Hooijer, A., Mamenun, Aldrian, E., & Van Dijk, A. I. J. M. (2012). Evaluation and bias correction of satellite rainfall data for drought monitoring in Indonesia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-133-2012

Wati, T., Hadi, T. W., Sopaheluwakan, A., & Hutasoit, L. M. (2021). Evaluation gridded precipitation datasets in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 893(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/893/1/012056

Yang, X., Yu, X., Wang, Y., He, X., Pan, M., Zhang, M., Liu, Y. I., Ren, L., & Sheffield, J. (2020). The Optimal Multimodel Ensemble of Bias-Corrected CMIP5 Climate Models over China. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Utomo, J. B., Yuli Handoko, E., Aldila Syariz, M., & Sopaheluwakan, A. (2025). Developing Surface Rainfall Data Based on Blending of Satellite-Based Products and Rain Gauge Observations in the Ngawi Region, East Java. JURNAL ILMU FISIKA | UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS, 17(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.17.2.110-124.2025

Issue

Section

Research Article

Citation Check